Social reinforcement as a means of changing disruptive behavior - a case study.
Read Online

Social reinforcement as a means of changing disruptive behavior - a case study. by Kaye Diane Daniels

  • 471 Want to read
  • ·
  • 6 Currently reading

Published .
Written in English


  • Operant conditioning.

Book details:

The Physical Object
Paginationvii, 44 l.
Number of Pages44
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL19630901M

Download Social reinforcement as a means of changing disruptive behavior - a case study.


  There are many different types of reinforcement, but when it comes to human beings, one of the most common is the naturally occurring social reinforcers that we encounter all around us every reinforcement refers to reinforcers such as smiles, acceptance, praise, acclaim, and attention from other people.   Reinforcement is related to the psychological process of motivation and is environmentally based. Reinforcers are external environmental events that follow a desired behavior. Reinforcement could be either positive or negative and is likely to strengthen the response and increase the probability of repetition. Skinner’s Reinforcement Theory.   The book is about a utopian community designed and maintained according to Skinnerian principles of operant behaviour and schedules of reinforcement. A similar application was made in an industrial situation in the Emery Air Freight case ("At Emery," ). By applying Skinnerian principles, which are based on numerous research findings, Emery.   Behavioral interventions have been advocated for conversion disorder, but controlled trials are lacking. The authors report the case of a year-old boy with conversion disorder after 3 months of persistent right arm pain and immobility whose symptoms rapidly resolved after an outpatient behavioral intervention using negative reinforcement.

reinforcement before the problem behavior occurs. 3. Adapt the schedule of reinforcement based on the student’s needs and developmental level. For young students or students with severe behavior problems, a very dense schedule of reinforcement should be used (i.e., once every 30 seconds). 4. Behavior: High levels of disruptive behavior Function: Escape What is the student trying to communicate? “I don’t want to do math tasks.” Intervention: Tasks triggering behavior are broken down into shorter steps (reducing duration), and given to the student one at .   1 Background. Disruptive behavior in schools has been a source of concern for school systems for several years. Indeed, the single most common request for assistance from teachers is related to behavior and classroom management (Rose & Gallup, ).Classrooms with frequent disruptive behaviors have less academic engaged time, and the students in disruptive classrooms . Reinforcement. The most effective way to teach a person or animal a new behavior is with positive reinforcement. In positive reinforcement, a desirable stimulus is added to increase a behavior.. For example, you tell your five-year-old son, Jerome, that if he cleans his room, he will get a toy.

behavior was disruptive or challenging, students were simply given consequences, including suspension, and even expulsion. While such consequences still exist today in school systems, there are many research-based strategies that demonstrate that a proactive and positive approach to teaching behavior expectations can have a great impact on schools. disruptive behavior during FCT in the current study is that disruptive behavior never produced social reinforcement and thus weakened the possible relation between disruptive behavior and negative. A study on the use of positive reinforcement in the classroom showed that it can be used to significantly improve students’ age-appropriate behaviors and social skills (like manners), and the effects will last even after the reward system is removed or discontinued (Diedrich, ).   Social learning theory asserts that learning or knowledge acquisition and behavior do not occur in a vacuum and that one of the most intrinsic influence upon them is social interaction (Shuell, ) Contrary to the implications of the terms and therefore their assumed meaning, positive vs. negative, not all positive reinforcement is effective.